Kokoy v. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Mohammed Kokoy |
| Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 3:2007cv00940 |
| September 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 Failure to make decision on naturalization petition |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kokoy v. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Mohammed Kokoy | |
| Represented By: | Charla Jo Steinmetz Haas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
