Wilson v. Wilkins et al
| Tawana S. Wilson |
| Boyce Wilkins and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee |
| 3:2008cv00057 |
| January 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| Robert Echols |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above in this memorandum, the Court GRANTS defendant Wilkins's motion for new trial or for remittitur 116 and SUGGESTS a remittitur of the jury's punitive damage award of $72,500.00. Plain tiff Wilson shall have the option of accepting a punitive damage award in the amount of $7,500.00 or, in the alternative, proceeding with a new trial limited to the issue of punitive damages. Plaintiff shall file a notice within ten days from the entry of this memorandum and order advising the Court whether she will accept the judgment as remitted or proceed to a new trial. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/13/12. (tmw)
|
|
Filing
134
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above in this memorandum, defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law 114 is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/7/12. (tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
