Thomas v. Fortner et al
Kenneth D. Thomas |
James Fortner and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee |
3:2008cv00274 |
March 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Robert Echols |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER: Petitioner's Objection To The Magistrates Report and Recommendation 47 is OVERRULED. Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing 48 is DENIED. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations 44 is Accepted. Petitioner's pro se Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is Denied. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss 34 is Granted. The habeas corpus petition is Dismissed With Prejudice. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final Judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Further, Because Petitioner cannot demonstrate that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the Court is correct in its ruling, a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 3/11/09.(dt) |
Filing 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Griffin recommends that Petitioner's Motion 20 for Summary Judgment be DENIED, Respondent's Motion 34 to Dismiss be GRANTED, and the Petition for Relief under Section 2254 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/30/09. (cc: Petitioner by reg. & cert. mail)(dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.