Lunsford v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Lunsford v. United States of America

Lunsford v. United States of America

Plaintiff:	Timothy Lamont Lunsford
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	3:2008cv00299
Filed:	March 21, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 12, 2012	Filing 14 ORDER: Before the Court is Movant's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c)(2) motion to amend his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed on August 17,2012. 12 . Once a movant exhausts his administ rative remedies, any further challenge to any computation of jail time credits must be filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Valona v. United States, 138 F.3d 693,694 (7th Cir. 1998); and in the district where Movant is incarcerated. Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 U.S. 426, 442-43 (2004). Movant is incarcerated at the FCI in Forrest City, Arkansas. Thus, the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas retains jurisdiction over Movant's claims. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Any appeal of this Order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/12/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (dt)
December 16, 2010	Filing 4 ORDER: Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice on Movant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim, but without prejudice on Movant's sentencing credits claim. This is the Final Order in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 12/16/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 12, 2012

Filing 14 ORDER: Before the Court is Movant's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c)(2) motion to amend his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed on August 17,2012. 12 . Once a movant exhausts his administ rative remedies, any further challenge to any computation of jail time credits must be filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Valona v. United States, 138 F.3d 693,694 (7th Cir. 1998); and in the district where Movant is incarcerated. Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 U.S. 426, 442-43 (2004). Movant is incarcerated at the FCI in Forrest City, Arkansas. Thus, the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas retains jurisdiction over Movant's claims. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Any appeal of this Order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/12/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (dt)

December 16, 2010

Filing 4 ORDER: Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice on Movant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim, but without prejudice on Movant's sentencing credits claim. This is the Final Order in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 12/16/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lunsford v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Lamont Lunsford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?