Lockard et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
James E. Lockard and Valerie J. Stober-Lockard |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aesgen, Inc., Bedford Laboratories, Hospira, Inc. and Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. |
3:2008cv00583 |
June 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
Davidson |
Joe Brown |
Todd J. Campbell |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 1706 ) is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants Motions to Dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Whipple (Docket Nos. 1642 and 1652 ) are GRANTED, and all claims of Plaintiff Whipple are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Lockard (Docket No. 1642 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/25/08. Associated Cases: 3:06-md-01760, 3:08-cv-00583, 3:08-cv-00710(km) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion to dismiss as to Lockard be denied and the Motion to dismiss as to Whipple be granted and that her case be dismissed as to all Defts without prejudice re (4 in 3:08-cv-00710, 6 in 3:08-cv-00583, 1642 in 3:06-md-01760). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/4/08. Associated Cases: 3:06-md-01760, 3:08-cv-00583, 3:08-cv-00710(km) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.