Daugherty et al v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
| James Ray Daugherty, Steve Daniel Allen, William Orman Knox, J.C. Hollingsworth, Daryle Rycardo Dowell, Sr., Ricky Wilford Balthrop, Sheliah Rhonda Hunter and William Robert Maupin |
| International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and United Auto Workers Local Union 737 |
| 3:2008cv00695 |
| July 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| John T. Nixon |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:185 Other Labor Litigation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/13/2012. (hb)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, Plaintiffs' Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Ruling (Docket Entry No. 51) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have sixty (60) days to depose Defendant s' representatives. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 39) is hereby DENIED without prejudice to refile following the completion of deposition discovery. Defendants shall have ninety (90) days to refile their motion. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/13/11. (af)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge initially denied the Plaintiffs' motion to reopen discovery 43 . Subsequently, the Magistrate Judge agreed to reconsider the matter 48 , and both parties have now briefed the issue 45 and 49 . Having reconsidered the matter, the Magistrate Judge again declines to reopen discovery. The Plaintiffs may have 14 days from the date of the entry of this order to respond to the pending motion for summary judgment 39 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/17/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider 44 is Granted and the Magistrate Judge will reconsider the matter in view of the new pleading. The Defendants in the matter have requested permission to file a brief on the issue of whether discovery sho uld be reopened 46 . That motion is GRANTED and the Defendants may have until 6/14/2010, to file a response to the Plaintiffs' motion to take discovery. In view of these proceedings the Plaintiffs' deadline for responding to the pending mo tion for summary judgment 39 is canceled. The Magistrate Judge will issue new deadlines for further proceedings following consideration of the Defendants response and the Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/3/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss. In addition, Defendants' Motion is converted to a Motion for summary judgment and additional briefing is ordered. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 3/31/10. (af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
