Rollen v. Mosby et al
| Brandon C. Rollen |
| (f/n/u) Miller, (f/n/u) Mosby, (f/n/u) Lewis and (f/n/u) Baldwin |
| 3:2008cv01053 |
| October 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 31 , to which no Objs have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. A ccordingly, Defts' Motion to Dismiss 27 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 12/29/09. (reg & cert mail to pltf) (tmw)
|
|
Filing
31
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that Defts' Motion to Dismiss 27 be GRANTED, and that this action be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/8/09. (reg & cert mail to pltf) (tmw)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/31/08. (reg & cert mail to pltf) (tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
