Mapco Express, Inc. v. Interstate Entertainment, Inc. et al
| Mapco Express, Inc. |
| Interstate Entertainment, Inc., Jarrell's of Pensacola, Inc., Kenneth Jarrell and Robert Breece |
| 3:2008cv01235 |
| December 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| John T. Nixon |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER: Plaintiffs Motions to Ascertain Status 65 and 67 are Granted. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS 62 Defendants' Motion in Limine and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 40 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Kenneth Jarrell is hereby DISMISSED from this action. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/11/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER: The Court hereby CONTINUES the Pretrial Conference, scheduled for September 30, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., and the Jury Trial, scheduled for October 5, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., until resolution of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 40 and all pleadings filed in response. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 9/27/2010. (dt)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER: Telephone Conference set for 9/21/2010 at 1:00 PM to discuss the status this case and to determine its readiness for trial. Counsel for the plaintiff shall initiate the conference call. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/15/10. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
