Kovacevich v. Vanderbilt University
||January 20, 2009
||US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
||Civil Rights: Jobs Office
||John T. Nixon
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 12, 2010
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court rules as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Motion For Partial Summary Judgment 73 is hereby DENIED; (2) Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment 76 is hereby DENIED; (3) Defe ndant's Motion To Strike Report Of Dr. Estrada-Belli 113 is hereby GRANTED; (4) Plaintiff's Motion To Strike Defendant's Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Material Facts Which Preclude A Grant Of Summary Judgment, D.E. 126 [1 35] is hereby DENIED; and (5) this case will proceed to Final Pretrial Conference, to be set in a separate Order. (6) At the Final Pretrial Conference the Court will hear argument and any evidence presented under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical s, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), in connection with the Motion On Behalf Of The Defendant, Vanderbilt University To Exclude The Testimony Of Plaintiffs Expert Witness, John Monaghan, Ph.D. 109 . It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 4/12/10. (tmw)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?