Smith v. City of Nashville et al
| Reese L. Smith, Jr. |
| City of Nashville, Nashville District Attorney General Office, Tammy Meade, Matthew Stephens, Deborah Housel, Amy Eisenbeck, All ADA of the District Attorney General Office in the city of Nashville, Tennessee, Eugenia R. Grayer, Isaac Conner and Mark Kovach |
| 3:2009cv00205 |
| March 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Davidson |
| Robert Echols |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER: The R & R 61 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. The claims against Defendants Tammy Meade, Matthew Stephens, Deborah Housel, Amy Eisenbeck and City of Nashville are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case is hereby DISMISSED because the claims against all named Defendants have been dismissed, either with or without prejudice. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 1/26/2010. (dt)
|
|
Filing
61
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Knowles Recommends that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against Defendants Tammy Meade, Matthew Stephens, Deborah Housel, Amy Eisenbeck, and the City of Nashville". Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/8/09. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
