Perryman v. Averitt Express, Inc.
Plaintiff: Antonio F. Perryman
Defendant: Averitt Express, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv00236
Filed: March 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: This case is dismissed with prejudice and the Court ORDERS this case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/13/09. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perryman v. Averitt Express, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio F. Perryman
Represented By: Barry R. Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Averitt Express, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?