Maxwell v. Internal Revenue Service et al
Plaintiff: Charles Phillip Maxwell
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES and Earnest G. Shultz
Case Number: 3:2009cv00308
Filed: April 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Taxes Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Robert Echols
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 26:7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER denying as moot 69 Motion to Disclose; denying 70 Motion to Disclose; denying 71 Motion for Judicial Notice and Show Cause Hearing; denying 73 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 77 Motion to Stay of Execution Pending Appeal. At the 12 /11/09 hearing, the Court provided Petitioner with a Financial Affidavit which Petitioner shall COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO THE COURT UNDER SEAL within ten (10) days of the hearing. Petitioner shall complete the form and ANSWER EACH INQUIRY FULLY AND TRUT HFULLY. If Plaintiff fails to complete the Affidavit and submit the same to the Court within the period provided, fails to answer any questions, or is evasive in his answers in any way, the Court will deem Petitioner able to pay the sanction in full and will set the matter for a further show cause hearing to enforce compliance with this Court's May 19, 2009 Order. During the same ten day period, the Government may submit whatever information it desires which relates to Petitioner's abi lity or inability to pay the sanction which has been imposed. Finally, as Petitioner was informed at the December 11, 2009 hearing, Petitioner is HEREBY ORDERED NOT TO MAKE ANY FURTHER FILINGS OR INSTITUTE ANY FURTHER ACTIONS in this Court and the C lerk is directed not to accept any further filings or actions filed by Mr. Maxwell, until either the sanction of $1,500 has been paid in full, or until further Order from this Court which specifically lifts the ban on making new filings or filing new actions. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 12/18/09. (xc: pltf by regular & certified mail) (cc: intake department, pro se law clerks) (af)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxwell v. Internal Revenue Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Phillip Maxwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Mark H. Wildasin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Mark H. Wildasin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earnest G. Shultz
Represented By: Mark H. Wildasin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?