Kingsland v. Media Mail Packaging and Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Janice Kingsland
Defendant: Media Mail Packaging and Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv00497
Filed: June 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Wilson
Presiding Judge: William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER: Upon stipulation of dismissal 26 , this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 4/7/10. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kingsland v. Media Mail Packaging and Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice Kingsland
Represented By: Kerry E. Knox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Media Mail Packaging and Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?