Bumpas v. Correct Care Solutions et al
| Darrell W. Bumpas |
| Correct Care Solutions, CCA Metro Davidson County Detention Facility, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Edward R. Escamilla, Keith Holley and Zachariah J. Bevis |
| 3:2009cv00523 |
| June 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 85 that the Plaintiff, Darrell W. Bumpas's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis 25 be granted and that the Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for fai lure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court granted Plaintiff's motions for extension of time to file objections. Docket Entry Nos. 92 and 95 . Plaintiff filed hisobjections 109 that the Court reviewed. Yet, in the interim, Plaintiff filed numerous motions and documents. (Docket Entry Nos. 99 through 108 ). Plaintiff has continued with his multiple filings. (Docket Entry Nos. 110 through 117 and 118 ). After de novo review, the Court ADOPTS the Re port and Recommendation 85 and the Plaintiff's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis 25 is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1915(e)(2)(B). All other pending motions (Docket Entry Nos. 99 , 108 , 113 and 122 ) are DENIED as moot. This is the Final Order in this action. Any appeal of this Order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.c. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 1/28/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: Plaintiff is hereby Ordered to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to provide the required affidavit within the time fram specified will result in the denial of his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, a failure to respond to the Court's Order could result in a dismissal of this action. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 5/26/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
