Crisma, Inc. et al v. SG Communications, LLC et al
| Crisma, Inc., Bourne Co., Jarabe Publishing Company, Frank Music Corp., Meredith Willson Music and Premium Latin Publishing, Inc. |
| SG Communications, LLC and Salvador Guzman |
| 3:2009cv00568 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Williamson |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER: On December 2, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation 62 , to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff Crisma, Inc. is awarded a judgment against the defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $16,000. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Bourne Co. is awarded a judgment against the defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $16,000. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Jarabe Publishing Company is awarded a judgment against the defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $16,000. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Frank Music Corp. and plaintiff Meredith Willson Music are awarded a joint judgment against the defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $16,000. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Premium Latin P ublishing, Inc. is awarded a judgment against the defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $32,000. It is further ORDERED that the defendants are ordered to pay attorneys' fees to plaintiffs' counsel in the amount of $2, 323.00, which shall be entered as a judgment against the defendants, jointly and severally. It is further ORDERED that the defendants are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from further infringing upon the musical compositions of the plaintiffs at issue in this case. Entry of this Order shall constitute the Judgment in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/28/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
62
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that a judgment be entered for each of the Plaintiffs against Defendants, jointly and severally, as set forth herein. Additionally, a judgment should be entered against Defendants, jointly and severally, in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $2,323.00 representing Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees. Finally, an injunction should be entered prohibiting Defendants from further infringing on the musical compositions at issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/2/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: On June 10, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation 45 , to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this cou rt. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that default is hereby ENTERED against both defendants. Plaintiffs' counsel shall have twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order within which to file appropriate affidavits for the determination of damages to be awarded in a default judgment. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/7/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
