Morabito et al v. Mathis et al
| Timothy Morabito, Peggy Morabito, Tim O'Neil, Andrew Snyder and Anna Ruth Heltsley |
| Barron A. Mathis, Stephen L. Westbrook, Jeremy L. Hopwood, Five Iron Technologies, LLC and Jeremy Hopwood 2008 Trust |
| 3:2009cv00599 |
| June 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Williamson |
| William J. Haynes |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 - Petition for Removal: Securities Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER: The Court has been advised by counsel that all remaining matters and things in controversy in this action have been compromised and settled.This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/31/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER: The District Judge has set this matter for a jury trial on 8/14/2012, with a final pretrial conference on 7/30/2012. It appears that all deadlines have now passed in this matter. Therefore, the Magistrate Judge certifies this matter ready for trial, and the Clerk is directed to forward the file to the District Judge. Unless otherwise directed by the District Judge, there appear to be no further proceedings to be conducted before the Magistrate Judge. Judge Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/25/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
