Arnold et al v. Schreiber Foods, Inc.
| John Arnold, Sid Edwards, Carlon Finley and Robert Underwood |
| Schreiber Foods, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv00744 |
| August 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER: Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment 61 is Granted, and this case is Dismissed With Prejudice. Entry of this Order shall constitute the Judgment in this action. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/10/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc. 33 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The plaintiffs cannot recover for time spent donning and doffing their uni forms, so that portion of their claim is dismissed. The plaintiffs' claim remains only to the extent that they seek to recover for (1) time spent sanitizing their boots, (2) pre-shift time after donning hairnets, beard nets, and earplugs, but before clocking in, and (3) post-shift time after clocking out, but before doffing uniforms. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/1/10. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
