Flottman v. Hickman County, Tennessee et al
Plaintiff: |
Priscilla Ann Flottman |
Defendant: |
Hickman County, Tennessee and Kenny Smith |
Case Number: |
3:2009cv00770 |
Filed: |
August 21, 2009 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Office: |
Nashville Office |
County: |
Davidson |
Presiding Judge: |
Todd J. Campbell |
Presiding Judge: |
Juliet E. Griffin |
Nature of Suit: |
Plaintiff |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
February 7, 2011 |
Filing
81
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that deft's 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and that all claims broughtby pltf against deft Hickman County be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 2/7/11. (rd)
|
November 3, 2010 |
Filing
80
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 78 Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, deft's 44 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Pltfs claims against deft City of Centerville for punitive damages and f or conduct occurring prior to 8/21/08, are DISMISSED. The 79 Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved in part and rejected in part. Therefore, deft's 50 Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The sanction to be imposed upon pltf is an adverse inference that the journals at issue would have been adverse to pltf and favorable to deft. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/3/10. (rd)
|
October 18, 2010 |
Filing
79
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that deft's 50 MOTION for Sanctions for Spoilation of Evidence be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, it is recommended that: (1) the portion of the deft's motion se eking dismissal of the pltf's claims be DENIED; (2) the portion of the motion seeking imposition of atty's fees be DENIED; (3) the portion of the motion seeking an adverse inference be GRANTED; and (4) the jury be instructed that pltf' s failure to preserve and locate her journals raises a rebuttable adverse inference that she was not assaulted form 8/21/08, through the date of her release from the Hickman County Jail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 10/18/10. (rd)
|
October 14, 2010 |
Filing
78
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that deft City of Centerville's 44 MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.Specifically: (1) the motion should be GRANTED as to pltf's claims for punitive damages and those claims should be DISMISSED with prejudice; (2) the motion should be GRANTED as to pltf's claims for conduct occurring prior to 8/21/08, and that those claims against deft City of Centerville should be DISMISSED with prejudice; and (3) the motion should be DENIED as to pltf's post-release claims and any claims for conduct occurring between 8/21/08, and the time she was released from the Hickman County Jail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 10/14/10. (rd)
|
June 4, 2010 |
Filing
46
ORDER: Plaintiff shall have until 6/23/10, to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss 44 . Any reply, if necessary, shall be filed within 14 days of the filing of the response or by July 7, 2010, if the response is filed on 6/23/2010. There shall b e no further filings in support of or in opposition to the pending motion to dismiss except with the express permission of the Honorable Todd J. Campbell, Chief Judge. The Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to Chief Judge Campbell for his consideration of the motion of defendant City of Centerville to dismiss and accompanying memorandum (Docket Entry Nos. 44-45), the plaintiff's response to be filed by 6/23/2010, and the reply to be filed, if necessary, no later than 7/7/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/4/10. (dt)
|
April 12, 2010 |
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/12/10. (tmw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?