Woods v. Wolosko et al
| Maurice Woods |
| Charles Michael Wolosko, David Starkey, Myers International Midways, Inc., John Doe Corporation 1 and John Doe Corporation 2 |
| 3:2009cv00839 |
| September 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Sumner |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 103 is DENIED, and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 106 is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to cl ose the file. The trial set for 4/17/2012, and the pretrial conference set for 4/9/2012, are cancelled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/7/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER: The Pretrial Conference is reset for 10/21/2011 at 10:30 AM before Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/7/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/16/11. (tmw)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant'sMotion to Dismiss 20 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 12/18/09. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
