Grizzell v. Cyber City Teleservices Marketing, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Grizzell v. Cyber City Teleservices Marketing, Inc.

Grizzell v. Cyber City Teleservices Marketing, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Neal Grizzell
Defendant:	Cyber City Teleservices Marketing, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2009cv01141
Filed:	December 2, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Williamson
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge:	Thomas Wiseman
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 20, 2010	Filing 40 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 8/12/2010 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. By Close of Business on Tuesday, 8/10/2010, Plaintiffs and Defendants shall fax to 615-736-2121, or e-mail directly to Monte_Klassen@tnmd.uscourts.gov, Courtroom Deputy to the undersigned, ex parte, separate settlement conference statements which shall specify their respective settlement positions. Parties shall exchange offers and demands at least 3 working days prior to the 8/12/2010 conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/20/10. (dt)
June 25, 2010	Filing 34 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file the proposed Amended Complaint which is attached as an exhibit to the Motion to Amend. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further case management as necessary. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 06/25/2010. (ab)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 20, 2010

Filing 40 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 8/12/2010 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. By Close of Business on Tuesday, 8/10/2010, Plaintiffs and Defendants shall fax to 615-736-2121, or e-mail directly to Monte_Klassen@tnmd.uscourts.gov, Courtroom Deputy to the undersigned, ex parte, separate settlement conference statements which shall specify their respective settlement positions. Parties shall exchange offers and demands at least 3 working days prior to the 8/12/2010 conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/20/10. (dt)

June 25, 2010

Filing 34 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file the proposed Amended Complaint which is attached as an exhibit to the Motion to Amend. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further case management as necessary. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 06/25/2010. (ab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grizzell v. Cyber City Teleservices Marketing, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neal Grizzell
Represented By:	Timothy H. Nichols
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cyber City Teleservices Marketing, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?