Reed et al v. Rutherford County Circuit Court et al
| Carl Reed and Constance Haliburton-Bryant |
| Rutherford County Circuit Court, Rutherford County General Sessions Court, Rutherford County Clerk of the General Sessions Court, Rutherford County Clerk of the Circuit Court, Richard Gleaves, Kidwell, South & Beasley, Brandon Booten and David Haley |
| 3:2009cv01163 |
| December 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Robert Echols |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R 4 is hereby ACCEPTED AND APPROVED; and (2) Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b) because it fails to state a cla im on which relief may be granted. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 3/17/10. (reg & cert mail to pltfs)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiffs' 1 Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 1/20/10. (reg & cert mail to pltfs) (tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
