Jet Harbor, Inc. v. Sumner County Regional Airport Authority

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Jet Harbor, Inc. v. Sumner County Regional Airport Authority

Jet Harbor, Inc. v. Sumner County Regional Airport Authority

Counter Defendant:	Jet Harbor, Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:	Sumner County Regional Airport Authority
Case Number:	3:2010cv00162
Filed:	February 18, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Sumner
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2010	Filing 13 ORDER: The defendant has filed a Motion to Remand (Docket No. 9), to which no timely response has been filed. Local Rule 7.01(b) provides, in part, as follows: "Each party opposing a motion shall serve and file a response, memorandum, affidavits and other responsive material not later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion,.... Failure to file a timely response shall indicate that there is no opposition to the motion." The motion is well taken and is not opposed; therefore , it is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is hereby ORDERED to REMAND this case to the Circuit Court for Sumner County, Tennessee, from whence it was removed. The Clerk shall TERM the Motion to Disqualify (Docket No. 12) and the Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 8) as moot. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 1st day of April 2010. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/1/10. (af)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2010

Filing 13 ORDER: The defendant has filed a Motion to Remand (Docket No. 9), to which no timely response has been filed. Local Rule 7.01(b) provides, in part, as follows: "Each party opposing a motion shall serve and file a response, memorandum, affidavits and other responsive material not later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion,.... Failure to file a timely response shall indicate that there is no opposition to the motion." The motion is well taken and is not opposed; therefore , it is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is hereby ORDERED to REMAND this case to the Circuit Court for Sumner County, Tennessee, from whence it was removed. The Clerk shall TERM the Motion to Disqualify (Docket No. 12) and the Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 8) as moot. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 1st day of April 2010. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/1/10. (af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jet Harbor, Inc. v. Sumner County Regional Airport Authority
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Counter defendant: Jet Harbor, Inc.
Represented By:	James J. Ramsey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Counter plaintiff: Sumner County Regional Airport Authority
Represented By:	Arthur Edward McClellan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?