Mohammed v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Kazim Mohammed |
| Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharma, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv00179 |
| February 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| John T. Nixon |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER: Pursuant to the Transfer Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL No. 2372, this case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and electronically transmit the record to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/17/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER: Motion to Vacate the Current Scheduling Order and Stay All Proceedings and Discovery 75 is Granted. The Court therefore VACATES all current deadlines and hearings in this case. The Court also STAYS proceedings pending the Judicial Panel's decision on Plaintiff s motion to create an MDL in the Northern District of Illinois, except to the extent that the parties may conduct the limited discovery requested by Defendants. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/14/12. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
