First Call Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
Plaintiff: First Call Ambulance Service, Inc.
Defendant: Department of Health and Human Services and Kathleen Sebelius
Case Number: 3:2010cv00247
Filed: March 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
Presiding Judge: John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Medicare
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL: All matters between these parties have been settled and compromised. This civil action is Dismissed. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/25/12. (dt)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/8/12. (rd)
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 17 Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Defts' 14 Motion to Dismiss for inadequate service of process is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/16/11. (rd)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that deft's 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Inadequate Service of Process by GRANTED and that the complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 1/28/11. (rd)
June 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Government's Motion to Reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference 10 is Denied as Moot. The government shall file its answer to plaintiff's complaint and a transcript of administrative proceedings by Friday, 9/3/2010. Therea fter, unless otherwise directed by the district judge, the undersigned will enter a scheduling order directing the filing of motions for judgment on the administrative record, to enable the judicial review contemplated by 42 U.S.C. § 1395ff(b). The undersigned will then enter a Report and Recommendation for disposition of the motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 6/4/10. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: First Call Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Call Ambulance Service, Inc.
Represented By: James A. Hewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?