Reilly v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Reilly v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Reilly v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Plaintiff:	John M. Reilly
Defendant:	Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Case Number:	3:2010cv00265
Filed:	March 19, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
Presiding Judge:	Joe Brown
Presiding Judge:	John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 1, 2011	Filing 19 ORDER: The Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement or in the Alternative to Reset on Court's Docket 17 is terminated as moot. The parties are directed to file within 30 days of the entry of this order an appropriate order dismissing this case w ith prejudice in accordance with the terms of the settlement that the parties reached. It appears that nothing further remains to be done by the Magistrate Judge and the Clerk is directed to transmit this file to Judge Nixon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/1/11. (dt)
July 20, 2010	Filing 16 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 10/29/2010. Discovery due by 1/31/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 2/28/2011. Case Management Conference is set for 11/16/2010 at 09:30 AM. Parties shall call (615) 695-2851 to participate. Jury Trial set for 8/23/2011 at 09:00 AM and Pretrial Conference set for 8/12/2011 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/20/10. (dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 1, 2011

Filing 19 ORDER: The Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement or in the Alternative to Reset on Court's Docket 17 is terminated as moot. The parties are directed to file within 30 days of the entry of this order an appropriate order dismissing this case w ith prejudice in accordance with the terms of the settlement that the parties reached. It appears that nothing further remains to be done by the Magistrate Judge and the Clerk is directed to transmit this file to Judge Nixon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/1/11. (dt)

July 20, 2010

Filing 16 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 10/29/2010. Discovery due by 1/31/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 2/28/2011. Case Management Conference is set for 11/16/2010 at 09:30 AM. Parties shall call (615) 695-2851 to participate. Jury Trial set for 8/23/2011 at 09:00 AM and Pretrial Conference set for 8/12/2011 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/20/10. (dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reilly v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M. Reilly
Represented By:	Jonathan A. Street
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?