Segovia v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
| Gabriel Segovia |
| Montgomery County, Tennessee and Norman Lewis |
| 3:2010cv00325 |
| March 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
ORDER: Defendant's motion 160 is hereby DENIED in its entirety. Furthermore, Plaintiff's Motion[s] to Ascertain Status of Availability of Student Resource Officer Position 200 and 203 are hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/16/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
213
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and FRCP 54(d)(2) and Plaintiffs Supplemental Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and FRCP 54(d)(2) (Docket Entry Nos. 153 and 192 ) are hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall be awarded $40,318.63 for reasonable attorney's fees and $438.45 for costs in this matter. Furthermore, Plaintiff's Objection to Notice Regarding Taxation of Costs (Docket Entry No. 205 ) is hereby OVERRULED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/26/2014. (hb)
|
|
Filing
152
JUDGMENT in favor of Gabriel Segovia against Montgomery County, Tennessee. Signed by Angie Brewer, Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/19/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER: Telephone Conference set for 1/20/2012 at 1:00 PM to be initiated by defendants' counsel, to be initiated by defendants' counsel, to address setting a new trial date and any other matters to be addressed prior to the trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/13/2012. (dt)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 65 Motion to Continue Trial and granting 66 Motion to Ascertain Status of Motion to Continue Trial. The case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further case management including setting a new trial date. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/5/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER: As provided herein, the plaintiff's Motion to Compel or in the Alternative Deem Documents as Business Records 61 is Denied. All such discovery shall be completed no later than 8/31/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/27/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER: In light of the Court's Order, this Motion to Reschedule Pretrial Conference 55 is Denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/12/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER: The parties shall have until 4/27/2011, to file any motions related to discovery or any other matters to be addressed by the Magistrate Judge prior to the trial in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/7/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Summary Judgment 29 filed by Defendants Montgomery County and Sheriff Norman Lewis is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (1) The Motion is GRANTED wi th respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment political association claim, and Plaintiff's state law claims for wrongful discharge and defamation; (2) The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim and D efendant Lewis' qualified immunity affirmative defense; and (3) The claims against Sheriff Lewis in his official capacity are DISMISSED. This case will proceed on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Montgomery County and Defendant Lewis in his individual capacity. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/2/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: On 1/14/2011, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment 29 . Plaintiff shall have until 2/14/2011, to file a response to the motion. The Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to Chief Judge Campbell for his consideration of the defendants' motion for summary judgment and accompanying filings (Docket Entry Nos. 29-32), the plaintiff's response to be filed by 2/14/2011, and any reply, if necessary, to be filed no later than 2/28/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/14/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 27 Motion to allow additional interrogatory questions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 12/21/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER: The plaintiff's motion to extend discovery deadline 22 is reluctantlyGRANTED to the extent that the deadline for the plaintiff to serve written discovery is again extended to 12/20/2010. The 11/15/2010, deadline for completion of all other fact discovery is not otherwise extended. As a result of entry of this order, Plaintiff's Motion to Ascertain Status 25 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 12/7/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: Telephone conference held on 8/20/2010, at which time the deadline for the plaintiff to respond to the defendants' outstanding written discovery was extended to 8/31/2010. If there are other delays in completing discovery, counsel for the parties are encouraged to schedule a conference call with the undersigned, as defendants' counsel did in this instance, to ensure that all fact discovery is completed by the 11/15/2010, deadline provided inthe orders entered 5/12/2010 10 - 11 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/23/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Discovery Conference. A telephone conference call is scheduled with counsel for the parties and the Court on Friday, 8/20/2010, at 2:00 p.m., to be initiated by defendants' counsel, to address whether or not the plaintiff has responded to the defendants' outstanding written discovery, and any other appropriate matters. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/16/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion to remove reference of conspiracy from original complaint. The plaintiff's complaint is amended as follows: The phrase "And Conspiracy to Defame" is deleted from the caption of § VII on page 9 ofthe plai ntiff's complaint. The defendants are not required to file an amended answer to the complaint, as now amended. If a scheduling conflict remains, counsel may move to reschedule the trial, and they are urged to file any such motion as soon as practical. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/24/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER: By contemporaneously entered order, the Court has approved and entered the plaintiff's proposed case management order 8 , with modifications addressed at the initial case management conference held on 5/10/2010. Those modifications, alon g with reconciliation of differences between the two orders, and other matters addressed on 5/10/2010, are as follows: The Clerk is directed to terminate the portion of the defendants' answer 9 that included a motion to dismiss inasmuch as def endants' counsel represented that she did not intend for the answer to also serve as a motion to dismiss. The portion of the defendants' answer 9 seeking a more definite answer is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall have until 5/24/2010, to file an amended complaint more definitely setting out the plaintiff's conspiracy-to-defame claim (§ VII). The defendants shall have until 6/7/2010, to file an answer to the plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/12/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management. Discovery is not stayed absent order of the District Judge. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the Initial Case Management Conference by order of the District Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/31/10. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
