Riley v. Hall et al
| Patrick S. Riley |
| Daron Hall, Wade Hales, John Troup, Joel Pace, K Cox, Pam Hale, Marcus Bodie, F/N/U Dicharia, (f/n/u) Watson, Correct Care Solution, F/N/U Vargas, Erik L/N/U, ABL and F/N/U Robins |
| 3:2010cv00598 |
| June 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
220
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to abide by the Court's Orders. The Court declines to award fees and costs to the Defendants. Any pending Mo tions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. The jury trial set for May 29, 2012, and the pretrial conference set for May 14, 2012, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/17/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
218
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the present motions for sanctions to include dismissal (Docket Entries 212 , 214 , 216 , 217 ) should be GRANTED. In the event these motions are granted , the pending motions for summary judgment (Docket Entry 194 ) by the CCS Defendants would be moot. However, if the motions to dismiss under Rule 41(b) are not granted, the Magistrate Judge would recommend that the motions for summary judgment (Docket Entry 194 ) be granted for the reasons stated in the supporting memorandum (Docket Entry 195 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 10/27/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 149 , to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and appr oved. Accordingly, Defendant Correct Care Solutions' Motion to Dismiss 69 is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Correct Care Solutions are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/26/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 182 , to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and appr oved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 158 is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendants Hall, Cox, Hale and Bodie are DISMISSED. In addition, all claims against Defendants Troup, Pace, Dicharia and Watson are DISM ISSED except Plaintiff's First and Fourteenth Amendment claims arising from the alleged assault upon him. Moreover, all claims against Defendant Robins are DISMISSED, except Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim arising from his treatment in the holding cell. IT IS SO ORDERED. Pam Hale, Daron Hall, Marcus Bodie and Kevin Cox terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/4/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
182
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons discussed above, the undersigned finds merit in the defendants' Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings 158 . Therefore, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that these Motions be GRANTED and all claims agains t Daron Hall, Kevin Cox, Pam Hale and Marcus Bodie be DISMISSED. It is further RECOMMENDED that all claims against Lt. Hales, Officers Troup, Pace, Dicharia and Watson also be DISMISSED, with the exception of those First and Fourteenth Amendments cla ims arising from the assault upon him. Finally, it is RECOMMENDED that all claims against Officer Robins be DISMISSED, with the exception of the Fourteenth Amendment claim arising from his treatment in the holding cell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/5/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
172
RECOMMENDATION: The Plaintiff has filed a motion for a continuance and anew trial date in this matter 168 . Magistrate Judge Brown recommmends that the present trial date 146 be continued for a minimum of six months, or be reset following a resolution of the pending motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 3/9/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 162 , to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order 81 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/25/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
162
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons discussed, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a need for injunctive relief at this time. Accordingly, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order 81 be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/7/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
149
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons discussed above, the plaintiff has failed to state a claim against Correct Care Solutions, LLC for which relief can be granted. Therefore, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss 69 be GRANTED and all claims against this defendant be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/13/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER denying 48 Motion in which pltf requests removal; denying 49 Motion to Amend petitioner's Amended Complaint; denying 50 Motion for an Order to perpetuate testimony; denying 84 Motion for a subpoena to force the production of docume nts; denying 108 Motion for Order causing physical and mental examination. The plaintiff's motions involve, for the most part, matters more properly addressed through discovery between the parties. With the entry of the scheduling order, the discovery process has begun. The plaintiff must first ask the defendants to provide him with the information he seeks. Only after he has been unsuccessful in this regard will the Court become involved in discovery matters. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 12/16/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
