Caveness v. Vogely & Todd, Inc. et al
| Tina Caveness |
| Vogely & Todd, Inc. and Don Durham |
| 3:2010cv00650 |
| July 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiff Tina Caveness' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 20 is hereby DENIED. The pretrial conference will be held on 9/26/2011 at 3:00 p.m., and the jury trial will commence at 9:00 a.m. on 10/11/2011, both as previously scheduled. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/30/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER: Judge Haynes Chambers has advised the Magistrate Judges office that this case is set for a a jury trial on October 18, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., with a final pretrial conference on October 3, 2011, at 3:00 p.m. Judge Haynes will issue a separate order setting out his requirements for both the trial and final pretrial conference at a later date. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/24/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
11
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 3/28/2011. Discovery due by 4/30/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 6/1/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/14/10. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
