Shelton v. Ray et al
| Lorenzo A. Shelton |
| Gayle Ray, James Fortner, Jerry Dickson, Dustin Mackin, Justin Jackson, Barry Sims and Shelly Himes |
| 3:2010cv00684 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
ORDER: On the day of trial, counsel for the Defendants, Arthur Crownover, advised the Court that subpoenas were served on Christina Middleton and Mark Turney without payment of witness fees. Middleton and Turney appeared for trial notwithstanding the absence of witness fees. The Court informed Plaintiff Shelton that he was still responsible for witness fees and that if he did not pay them the Court would order the fees deducted from his account. Plaintiff understood and agreed. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/1/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER granting 149 MOTION to Continue Trial and Pretrial Conference. Jury Trial is reset for 10/1/2013 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Pretrial Conference reset for 9/20/2013 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 9/13/2013. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/18/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER granting 122 MOTION to Continue Trial Date. This case is Rescheduled for a Jury Trial on 4/16/2013 at9:00 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Pretrial Conference reset for 4/1/2013 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 3/25/2013. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/10/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 67 , to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted an d approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss 50 filed by Defendants Ray, Fortner and Himes is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ray and Fortner and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hines in her official capacity are DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/18/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
67
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 50 MOTION to Dismiss filed by James Fortner, Shelly Himes, Gayle Ray be GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Specifically, the undersigned recommends that this Motion be GRANTED with regard to Defendants Ray and Fortner, and DENIED with regard to Defendant Himes. Any party has 14 days after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation with the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 03/22/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(ab)
|
|
Filing
52
SCHEDULING ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 12/20/2010. Discovery due by 4/20/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 5/20/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/21/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
