Brown et al v. Realty Mortgage Corporation et al
| Van A. Brown and Tabitha Brown |
| Realty Mortgage Corporation, Retail Loan, Logos Title & Escrow LLC, Ronald M. Harkavy, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Does 1-100 |
| 3:2010cv00719 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER: On February 28, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 15), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m), FED. R. CIV. P., for failure to obtain service of process on the defendants. It is so ORDERED. Enter this 23rd day of March 2011. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/23/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated, the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice due to plaintiffs' failure to obtain service of process on defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 2/28/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
