Mengistu v. Bank of America

Mengistu v. Bank of America

Plaintiff:	Kassa Mengistu
Defendant:	Bank of America
Case Number:	3:2010cv00856
Filed:	September 13, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 24, 2012	Filing 105 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Therefore, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part (See Order). Therefore, Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel 102 is den ied as moot, and Defendant's Objection to the Report and Recommendation is also moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/24/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
September 7, 2012	Filing 99 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion for summary judgment 74 of Defendant Bank of America, N.A., be: 1) GRANTED as to the plaintiff's claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, his claim und er the HAMP Act, his state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, and his state law libel claim based on information provided to consumer reporting agencies about the plaintiff's mortgage payment history and that these claims be DISMISSED from the action; and 2) be DENIED as to the plaintiff's state law claim for unjust enrichment and his state law claim for libel as to information provided to the plaintiff's homeowner's insurance provider. If the Court ad opts this Report and Recommendation and allows the plaintiff's claims to proceed as set out herein, the Court recommends that the plaintiff be granted leave to renew his previously filed motion for appointment of counsel 63 , and that, upon any such motion, counsel be appointed for the plaintiff for the remainder of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 9/7/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 24, 2012

Filing 105 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Therefore, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part (See Order). Therefore, Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel 102 is den ied as moot, and Defendant's Objection to the Report and Recommendation is also moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/24/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

September 7, 2012

Filing 99 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion for summary judgment 74 of Defendant Bank of America, N.A., be: 1) GRANTED as to the plaintiff's claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, his claim und er the HAMP Act, his state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, and his state law libel claim based on information provided to consumer reporting agencies about the plaintiff's mortgage payment history and that these claims be DISMISSED from the action; and 2) be DENIED as to the plaintiff's state law claim for unjust enrichment and his state law claim for libel as to information provided to the plaintiff's homeowner's insurance provider. If the Court ad opts this Report and Recommendation and allows the plaintiff's claims to proceed as set out herein, the Court recommends that the plaintiff be granted leave to renew his previously filed motion for appointment of counsel 63 , and that, upon any such motion, counsel be appointed for the plaintiff for the remainder of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 9/7/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mengistu v. Bank of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kassa Mengistu
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?