Patterson v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Janet Patterson
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 3:2010cv00996
Filed: October 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER: The parties have advised the Court that they have reached a full settlement in this case. As a result, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the trial, scheduled on 5/22/2012, is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/21/12. (dt)
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER: As addressed during the telephone conference call with counsel for the parties and the Court held on September 6, 2011, the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket Entry No. 75) was DENIED, with leave for the defendant to renew after the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The Clerk is directed to file and docket the plaintiff's amended complaint (Docket Entry No. 90-1). As addressed during the telephone conference call with counsel for the parties and the Cou rt on September 8, 2011, the plaintiff's motion to compel and for attorney's fees (Docket Entry No. 85) and the plaintiff's motion for clarification (Docket Entry No. 84) were GRANTED as provided in the contemporaneously entered order, except that the Court declined to award attorney's fees against the defendant. The plaintiff's motion to compel discovery and to amend the schedule (Docket Entry No. 82) was essentially subsumed into the later filed motion to compel, and t hus was DENIED as MOOT. On October 11, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation of agreed protective order (Docket Entry No. 95). Although there was no provision for the Court to sign the order, assuming that the parties wanted to convert the stipulatio n into an agreed protective order, the stipulation is deemed to be a motion for entry of agreed protective order, and, as such, is GRANTED, and the agreed protective order is contemporaneously entered. As a housekeeping matter, the defendant's m otion to file a reply (Docket Entry No. 96) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file and docket the plaintiff's reply (Docket Entry No. 96-1). The defendant's motion to continue the trial (Docket Entry No. 106) is GRANTED. The pretrial con ference, scheduled on January 12, 2012, and trial, scheduled on January 24, 2012, are CANCELLED. However, a hearing on the defendant's partial motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 91) and the plaintiff's motion for leave to file second amend ed complaint and to amend scheduling order (Docket Entry No. 101) is scheduled on Tuesday, January 24, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom No. 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN, at which time a new trial date will be scheduled and all other pending matters will also be addressed. As a result, the plaintiff's motion for a telephonic hearing (Docket Entry No. 97) is DENIED as MOOT. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/9/12. (af)
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER: Telephone Conference set for 7/5/2011 at 4:00 PM, to be initiated by defendant's counsel, to address the plaintiff's motion to extend scheduling deadlines and to allow additional discovery 65 , and other scheduling issues. Prior to the 7/5/2011, conference call, the defendant shall serve any additional documents responsive to the written discovery already served by the plaintiff to which the defendant does not assert any objection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/27/11. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet Patterson
Represented By: Timothy W. Burrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Michele E. Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?