Garcia et al v. Conway
Plaintiff: Francisco Garcia and Gregorio Lopez
Defendant: Isa Conway
Case Number: 3:2010cv01069
Filed: November 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiffs are hereby AWARDED attorney fees in the amount of $5,198.92. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/23/11. (copy mailed to Isa Conway, 5612 Cedar Ash Crossing, Antioch, TN 37013 by regular & certified mail) (af)
October 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: Accordingly, (1) The R & R 20 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 15 is hereby GRANTED; (3) A JUDGMENT shall be entered in FAVOR OF Plaintiff Francisco Garcia and AGAINST Defendant ISA Conway d/b/a C & M Construction for unpaid wages and overtime in the total amount of $897.00, plus an additional equal amount in liquidated damages pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for a total amount of $1,794.00, plus costs and a reaso nable attorney's fee; (4) A JUDGMENT shall be entered in FAVOR OF plaintiff Gregorio Lopez and AGAINST Defendant ISA Conway d/b/ C & M Construction for unpaid wages and overtime in the amount of $1,947.00, plus an additional equal amount of unliquidated damages pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for a total amount of $3,894.00, plus costs and a reasonable attorney's fee; and (5) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with the foregoing and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/11/11. (tmw)
July 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons, the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that plaintiffs' motion for entry of judgment by default be GRANTED, and that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant Conway in the amount of $1,947.00 in unpaid wages and overtime plus an additional equal amount of unliquidated damages pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for a total amount of $3,894.00 plus costs and a reasonable attorney's fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/8/11. (af)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia et al v. Conway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Garcia
Represented By: Cynthia J. Cutler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregorio Lopez
Represented By: Cynthia J. Cutler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Isa Conway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?