Dotson v. Workforce Essentials, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Tonya D. Dotson
Defendant: Workforce Essentials, Inc. and Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development
Case Number: 3:2010cv01099
Filed: November 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/29/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER: On 10/19/2012, the parties filed a joint notice of settlement of the plaintiff's claims against defendant Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development 78 . As a result, the defendant's motion to compel and extend 74 is rendered MOOT, and the Clerk is directed to terminate that motion as pending. By 10/29/2012, the defendant shall file a notice of when it expects approval from the Tennessee Attorney General. If the parties have already filed an agreed order or stipu lation of dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against the defendant by 10/29/2012, there is no need for the defendant to file such a notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 10/23/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Ms. Dotson's claims against Workforce Essentials, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close this case against Workforce on the records with this Court. This Order shall constitute a final judgment on the case against Workforce Essentials, Inc. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/16/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER: Status Conference held on 5/14/2012. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion to dismiss 67 as pending. In consultation with the Honorable Aleta Trauger Jury Trial is reset for 7/30/2013 at 9:00 AM and the Pretrial Conference is reset for 7/26/2013 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. As a result, the following scheduling deadlines are extended:Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 10/31/2012. Discovery deadline is reset for 12/21/2012. Dispostive Motions deadline is reset for 1/25/2013. (SEE ORDER FOR OTHER DEADLINES). Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/16/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
May 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER RESETTING JURY TRIAL: Jury Trial set for 7/30/2013 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. Pretrial Conference set for 7/26/2013 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/23/2013. Exhibit List due and Witness List due by 7/23/2013. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/15/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER: MOTION to Continue the Status Conference 61 is Granted. Status Conference is reset for 5/14/2012 at 3:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/17/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: Status Conference set for 4/30/2012 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin, to address any outstanding written discovery and any scheduling issues. The plaintiff is warned that her failure to appear on 4/30/2012, either personall y or through counsel, could result in the dismissal of her case for failure to comply with the 3/23/2012, order and failure to appear as directed pursuant to Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/16/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to the Honorable Aleta Trauger for her consideration of the unopposed motion to withdraw. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/19/12. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dotson v. Workforce Essentials, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tonya D. Dotson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Workforce Essentials, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?