Forster v. Schofield et al
| Anthony D. Forster |
| Gayle Ray, Derrick Schofield, Ricky J. Bell, Desiree Andrews and Jane Doe |
| 3:2011cv00109 |
| February 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Schofield and Colson 111 is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against these two Defendants are DISMISSED. All Defendants in this ma tter having been dismissed as parties, the Clerk is irected to close the file. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/18/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
133
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Knowles Recommends that Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment 111 be Granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/2/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 109 Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, defts' 84 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and pltf's claims against defts Desiree Andrews and Corectional Medical Services are DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 12/29/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd)
|
|
Filing
109
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned concludes that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that Defendants Andrews and CMS are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, the undersigned reco mmends that Defendant CMS' Motion for Summary Judgment 84 be GRANTED, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Andrews and as to Defendant CMS. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/8/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections and Response, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled , and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Emergency Application for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order 4 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/14/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
95
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's "Emergency Application for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order" 4 should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/17/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: Plaintiff's 4 Emergency Application for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order are returned to the Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation which shall set forth how Plaintiff does or does not meet the requiremen ts for injunctive relief. Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Order to Reverse the Magistrate Judge's Decision to Deny the Appointment of Counsel for Limited Purposes is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judges 19 Order. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 04/07/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(ab)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that pltf's 4 Emergency Application for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 3/10/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
