Greenhill v. Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. et al
| LeShane Greenhill |
| Hoffman-LaRoche Inc., Roche Laboratories Inc., F. Hoffman-La Roche LTD, Roche Holding LTD and John Doe #1-10 |
| 3:2011cv00234 |
| March 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER: Pursuant to the Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-28) of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Docket No. 1626, this case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and electronically transmit the record to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/2/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management. Discovery is not stayed absent order of the District Judge. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/15/11. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
