Norfolk County Retirement System v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Norfolk County Retirement System
Defendant: Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne T. Smith and W. Larry Cash
Case Number: 3:2011cv00433
Filed: May 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Williamson
Presiding Judge: E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 405 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/2/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 398 ORDER entering temporary stay and cancelling trial date. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 397 ORDER Concerning depositions, settlement efforts and scheduling order. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 395 ORDER: For the reasons discussed the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court GRANTS Lead Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 270). The Court CERTIFIES the following Class: All persons who and entities who purchased the pub licly traded common stock of CHS from July 27, 2006 through April 8, 2011, inclusive, or who were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, the officers and directors of the company, at all relevant times, members of their immediate families and their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns and any entry in which Defendants have or had a controlling interest. Lead Plaintiff (NYC Funds) is APPOINTED as Class Representative, and Lowey Dannenberg is APPOINTED as Class Counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED.Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/26/19. (af)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 308 ORDER setting Telephone Conference and schedule for pending matters. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)
June 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 249 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 177 filed by Defendants Community Health Systems, Inc., Wayne T. Smith, and Larry Cash is hereby GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WIT H PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/16/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws Under Seal ("Motion") (Doc. No. 69), which pertains to one document (Doc. No. 70). Plaintiffs' Motion is hereby GRANTED; the aforementioned document may be filed under seal. It is so ORDERED. Entered this 19th day of July, 2012. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 7/19/12. (afs)
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: The Court finds the Report to be thorough and its recommendations to be well-founded. The Court therefore ADOPTS the Report 60 in its entirety. The above-captioned cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED under the lead case 3:11-cv-0433, and all futur e filings are to be made in this action. The Court further DENIES Detroit's Motion 22 and Alberta/Boston's Motion 29 . The Court GRANTS NYC Fund's Motion 23 , Appoints NYC Funds as lead Plaintiff in the consolidated action, and APPROVES the counsel selected by NYC Funds as lead counsel. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 12/28/2011. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norfolk County Retirement System v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norfolk County Retirement System
Represented By: Rachel A. Avan
Represented By: Christopher J. Keller
Represented By: Michael W. Stocker
Represented By: James Gerard Stranch, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Community Health Systems, Inc.
Represented By: John R. Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne T. Smith
Represented By: John R. Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W. Larry Cash
Represented By: John R. Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?