Whitaker v. Gates
Plaintiff: Nancy Whitaker
Defendant: Robert M. Gates
Case Number: 3:2011cv00522
Filed: June 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 227 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/26/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, (1) the defendant's Motion in Limine (Docket No. 98 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and (2) the plaintiffs Motion in Limine (Docket No. 105 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/8/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER: The deposition of Ms. Rice will be taken on April 8, 2014; the deposition of Ms. Davis will be taken on April 14, 2014; and the deposition of the Plaintiff will be taken on April 23, 2014. All depositions, absent agreement of the parties to a different time, will start at 9:00 a.m. local time. The deadlines for dispositive motions and the trial date will remain as previously set 43 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 3/28/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER: Telephone Conference held on 10/31/2013. Discovery deadline reset for 3/14/2014. Dispositive Motions deadline reset for 4/30/2014. Jury Trial reset for 10/7/2014 at 9:00 AM before Senior Judge John T. Nixon. Pretrial Conference reset for 9/26/2014 at 10:00 AM before Senior Judge John T. Nixon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 10/31/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: A telephone conference was held with the parties to discuss scheduling issues. Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Senior Judge John T. Nixon., Jury Trial set for 9/17/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Se nior Judge John T. Nixon. Discovery may remain open until 1/31/2013. Dispositive Motions will be due on or before 3/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/26/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) Modified on 9/26/2012 (afs).
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying 24 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/11/12. (afs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitaker v. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Whitaker
Represented By: Debra A. Wall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert M. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?