Vann v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Vann v. Social Security Administration

Vann v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Billy V. Vann
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2011cv00525
Filed:	June 3, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Houston
Presiding Judge:	Joe Brown
Presiding Judge:	Thomas Wiseman
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 11, 2012	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has read and considered the Report and Recommendation 20 and finds the same to be correct in fact and law. It is therefore adopted by this Court. The Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the A dministrative Record, Document # 9 , is hereby GRANTED in part and this cause is REMANDED to the Commissioner for consideration of Plaintiff's literacy and to consider Dr. Elalayli's August 2010 RFC assessment as new and material evidence. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 6/11/2012. (hb)
August 15, 2011	Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record supported by a brief within 30 days of entry of this order. Defendant shall, within 30 days of service of the plaintiff's brief, file a brief in response. Plaintiff has 20 days after service of the defendant's response to file a reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/15/11. (dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 11, 2012

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has read and considered the Report and Recommendation 20 and finds the same to be correct in fact and law. It is therefore adopted by this Court. The Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the A dministrative Record, Document # 9 , is hereby GRANTED in part and this cause is REMANDED to the Commissioner for consideration of Plaintiff's literacy and to consider Dr. Elalayli's August 2010 RFC assessment as new and material evidence. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 6/11/2012. (hb)

August 15, 2011

Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record supported by a brief within 30 days of entry of this order. Defendant shall, within 30 days of service of the plaintiff's brief, file a brief in response. Plaintiff has 20 days after service of the defendant's response to file a reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/15/11. (dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vann v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billy V. Vann
Represented By:	Jeremy L. Bordelon
Represented By:	Eric L. Buchanan
Represented By:	Robert Scott Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?