Hobson v. Social Security Administration et al
Eric Jefferson Hobson |
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification |
3:2011cv00737 |
August 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
John S. Bryant |
John T. Nixon |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 7/10/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) |
Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendation and GRANTS 12 Motion for Judgment on the Record. The Court REVERSES and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings as outlined in the Report. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/22/2013. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In light of the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record be GRANTED, and that the decision of the SSA be REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Report, to include rehearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 5/2/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.