Pigott v. Battle Ground Academy et al
Plaintiff: Amy C. Pigott
Defendant: Battle Ground Academy and John W. Griffith
Case Number: 3:2011cv00764
Filed: August 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Williamson
Presiding Judge: Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OF THE COURT: For the following reasons, we deny Plaintiff's first motion in limine (Dkt. No. 52) and grant the second (Dkt. No. 53). We deny both of Defendants' motions in limine (Dkt. Nos. 4950). Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 4/25/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER: Telephone conference held on 3/7/2013. The parties have continued settlement discussions. Although the prospects for settlement do not appear substantial at this point, the parties agreed to continue their negotiations. Counsel for the part ies shall schedule a telephone conference call with the Magistrate Judge before 4/30/2013, if they want to address potential settlement or any other matters prior to trial. Unless directed to do so beforehand, if the Court has not heard from the p arties prior to 4/30/2013, the file will be forwarded to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen prefatory to the 5/13/2013, pretrial conference and May 14, 2013, trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/7/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER: Jury Trial RESET for 5/14/2013 09:00 AM before Judge Marvin E. Aspen. Pretrial Conference RESET for 5/13/2013 11:30 AM before Judge Marvin E. Aspen. Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 9/20/2013. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Defendants Battle Ground Academy and John W. Griffith's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 13) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1) Summary Judgment is G RANTED in favor of Defendant Griffith on Plaintiff's claims arising under Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-21-301(2). 2) Summary Judgment is DENIED on all other claims. 3) Plaintiff's common-law retaliatory discharge claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further case management. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 11/15/12. (af)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pigott v. Battle Ground Academy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Battle Ground Academy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John W. Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy C. Pigott
Represented By: Douglas B. Janney, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?