Shrum et al v. Riker et al
Josh Malcolm and James Shrum |
Sonya Troutt and Adriel Riker |
3:2011cv00938 |
October 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Sumner |
Joe Brown |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 85 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the 2/5/13 trial is CANCELLED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/10/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(rd) |
Filing 85 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the present trial date of February 5, 2013, be canceled and this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 12/18/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 60 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 56 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. All claims asserted by pltf Josh Malcolm are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/7/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd) |
Filing 56 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that defts' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and that all of pltf Josh Malcolm's claims in this matter be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/9/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd) |
Filing 35 ORDER TO PRODUCE: The Sheriff of Robertson County Detention Center shall produce and deliver inmate Josh Malcolm, to this Court no later than 3:15 p.m. on Monday, 3/12/12, to Courtroom No. 783, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, before the Mag istrate Judge. This Order to Produce shall be in effect for any subsequent days that the hearing may continue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/23/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail; Certified copy to Warden, Sgt. Reed, TDOC and USMS.)(rd) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to send plaintiff Malcolm a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of Administrative Order No. 93. Plaintiff Malcolm, in turn, is directed to do one of the following within thirty (30) days of the date that he receives this order: (1) either pay his portion of the filing fee; or (2) complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis provided in accordance with Administrative Order No. 93, and return the properly completed application to the dist rict court with a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of the entry of this order, as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff Malcolm is forewarned that if he do es not comply with this order within the 30-day time frame specified, the court is required under the law to presume that he is not a pauper, assess his portion of the filing fee against him anyway, and dismiss his action for want of prosecution. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/13/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail along w/blank ifp app and AO No. 93 to pltf Malcolm.)(tmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.