Acree v. Metropolitan Government for Nashville and Davidson County et al
| Don Acree |
| Metropolitan Government for Nashville and Davidson County, f/n/u Oliver and Jim Combs |
| 3:2011cv00982 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court enters the following rulings: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 25) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and Plaintiff Don Acrees Objections thereto (Docket No. 28) ar e hereby OVERRULED; (2) Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 2 and 23) are hereby GRANTED insofar as Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff's federal claims on statute of limitations grounds;(3) The Court hereby DECLINES to exercise jurisdiction of Plaintiff's state law claims, and those claims are hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Davidson County, Tennessee; and (4) The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/8/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(afs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
