Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp. et al
| James C. Pierson |
| Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., Quad/Graphics, Inc., QG Printing Corp. and QG, LLC |
| 3:2011cv01126 |
| November 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER RESETTING JURY TRIAL: Jury Trial set for 3/10/2015 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. Pretrial Conference set for 3/6/2015 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 3/3/2015. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/3/2015. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/6/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER: Defendant shall respond to the plaintiff's Motion For Stay of Execution on Taxation of Costs 86 by Monday, July 29, 2013. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/26/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM: An appropriate Order will enter. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/7/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the plaintiff's Objections 29 are OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part. In particular, the plaintiff's first objection is OVERRULED, while his second and third objections are SUSTAINED. The defendant shall admit or deny the plaintiff's Fourth Request for Admission within ten (10) days of the date of this order. It is so Ordered. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/10/12. (tmw)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: Plaintiff seeks a Request for Admission from Defendant, to which Defendant has objected. This dispute was referred to the Magistrate Judge on March 24, 2012. 23 . For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's objection to the Request for Admission is sustained. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/23/12. (tmw)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: A discovery issue was referred to the undersigned by Judge Trauger for resolution. A telephone conference was held with the parties in this matter on 5/1/2012. The Plaintiff filed specific requests and objections, which are set out in a docume nt entitled Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's First Requests for Admissions which will be filed as Exhibit 1 to this Order. After discussion with counsel, the Magistrate Judge directs the Defendants to either admit or deny the Request for Admission 1. From the discussion, this appears to be the one that should be admitted. Concerning the Request for Admission 2, the Magistrate Judge believes that this is part of the settlement discussions, and as such, need not be answered. As to Req uest for Admission 3, the Magistrate Judge holds that the Defendants should either admit or deny whether there was a second telephone call on 11/8/2011. Request for Admission 4 is more complicated and difficult. It requests that the Defendants admit or deny statements purportedly made by the Defendants' in-house counsel to Plaintiff's counsel before the lawsuit was actually filed. The parties are directed to file a brief on this issue with case citations within seven days. The fifth request for admission is apparently being handled through other means of discovery and no ruling was needed or requested concerning Request for Admission 5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/2/12. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
