Bond Safeguard Insurance Company v. Roy et al
| Bond Safeguard Insurance Company |
| Amber Vanloh, Roy's Construction, Inc., Roy's Development, LLC, The Living Trust of Gerald Robert Roy and Gerald R. Roy |
| 3:2011cv01129 |
| November 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| John T. Nixon |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
DEFAULT JUDGMENT granting 26 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff be granted judgment and recover from Defendants Roy Construction, Inc. and Roy's Development, LLC the sum of $242,600, plus interest from the date of the judgment as prov ided by the law for all of which execution shall issue if necessary. This judgment is entered by the Court at the request of the Plaintiff and upon affidavit that said amount is due in accordance with Rule 55 (b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 6/27/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER: MOTION to Continue Hearing 29 is Granted and the Court Continues the Hearing to 6/25/2012 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/9/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: Before the Court are Plaintiff Bond Safeguard Insurance Company's Notice of Dismissal as to Defendant Gerald R. Roy 24 and Notice of Dismissal as to Defendant Amber Vanloh in her Capacity as Trustee of the Living Trust of Gerald Robert Roy 25 . Defendants Gerald R. Roy and Amber Vanloh are therefore DISMISSED as defendants to this action. Gerald R. Roy and Amber Vanloh terminated. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/3/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
21
ENTRY OF DEFAULT IN PART: Pending is Plaintiff's Application for Default against all Defendants 14 , Plaintiff's Application as to Defendants Gerald R. Roy, the Living Trust of Gerald R. Roy and Amber Vanloh as Trustee of the Living Trust of Gerald Robert Roy is denied. The Clerk cannot find that service has been obtained on these Defendants. The Clerk does find that valid service has been performed upon Defendants Roy's Construction, Inc., and Roys Development, LLC, as it appear s to the Clerk that the individual who signed the certified mail receipts does have actual or implied authority to accept service on behalf of those business entities. Neither of these two Defendants has responded within the time frame allowed by law and the entry of default against them is therefore appropriate. Accordingly, Default is Hereby Entered against Defendants Roys Construction, Inc., and Roys Development, LLC. Signed by Keith Throckmorton, Clerk of Court, on 4/4/12. (xc: Sent to all defendants by regular, first class mail on this date.) (dt)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER: This matter was set for a telephone conference on 3/14/2012, at 11:00 a.m. It was clearly specified that the telephone conference would only be canceled if default was issued as to all Defendants. From an examination of the docket sheet it app ears that an effort to serve the last remaining Defendant has been made. The docket does not reflect whether or not service of process was actually accomplished on Mr. Roy. Plaintiff's counsel is requested to advise the Court the date Mr. Roy wa s served. Plaintiff's counsel is free to file a motion for default. In filing for default the Plaintiff may need to provide a certificate showing that none of the individual Defendants are in the military service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 3/15/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER: A Case Management Conference was held in this matter on 2/6/2012. This case is set for a further conference to be conducted by telephone on 3/14/2012, at 11:00 a.m. To participate in the conference call, parties shall call 615-695-2851 at the scheduled time. In the event that a default is issued as to all Defendants, the telephone conference will be automatically canceled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/6/12. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
