Cantrell v. Hale et al
| Ricardo D. Cantrell |
| Richard Pickens, Hugh Watson, Dana Williams, Pamela Hale, Kevin Cox, Davidson County Sheriff's Office, City of Nashville, Davidson County, Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, William Gise, Jonathan Sandoval, Raymond Flaherty and Mark Lang |
| 3:2011cv01142 |
| December 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
190
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 189 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is a dopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants (Docket Nos. 177 , 178 , 181 , 186 ) are GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the file. The pretrial conference set for July 21, 2014, and the jury trial set for July 29, 2014, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Any appeal from this Order is not certified as taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/9/14. (afs)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting 80 Motion for Leave to Take Plaintiff's Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/25/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER: Inasmuch as the Plaintiff did not file a motion to amend his complaint with a proposed amendment attached to it by June 29th. That Motion for Extension of Time to Amend 66 is terminated as MOOT. The Plaintiff, instead of filing a request to file an amended complaint, merely filed a proposed amended complaint 68 . The proposed amended complaint is DENIED. In view of this ruling to deny the proposed amended complaint, the motion to strike 69 is terminated as MOOT. The Clerk is directed to advise the Plaintiff of the cost of copying the new proposed amended complaint, and the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy upon payment of that amount. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/3/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
32
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 8/31/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 1/11/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 3/30/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER:This matter is set for a Rule 16 case management conference on 3/29/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. The Defendant is directed to prepare a draft case management schedule and send a copy to the Plaintiff seven days before the hearing. The Plaintiff should bring with him to the case management conference any proposed changes to the order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 3/12/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
