Sisk v. Gannet Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Eileen Sisk
Defendant: Gannet Company, Inc., Gannet Company, Inc. Income Protection Plan and Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Case Number: 3:2011cv01159
Filed: December 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Cheatham
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER: The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, the Response, and the file. The Objections are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judg ment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 70) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff is awarded short-term disability benefits and the case is remanded to Defendant for consideration of Plaintiff's entitlement to long-term benefits under the Plan. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/13/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER granting 95 Motion for Leave to File Response to 95 Objections. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/5/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
April 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 89 REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Brown RECOMMENDS that Ms. Sisk's motion for judgment on the administrative record be GRANTED in PART in that she be awarded the short term disability benefits, as well as any other appropriate relief , she was denied by Aetna's unreasonable consideration of her claims. Further, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Ms. Sisk's motion be DENIED in PART and the case remanded to Gannett for consideration of Ms. Sisk's entitlement to long term disability benefits under the Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting re 66 First MOTION for Extension of Time Within Which to File Her Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record and Supporting Brief filed by Eileen Sisk. Response due by 10/29/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/15/13. (la)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER: Telephone conference held on 5/16/2013. Plaintiff will file any requests they have for discovery by 6/3/2013. The Defendants will have 14 days to respond. There will be no reply absent Court permission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/20/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER: Telephone Conference is set for 5/16/2013 at 3:30 PM to discuss setting deadlines for the completion of this case. To participate in the conference call, parties will call 615-695-2851 at the scheduled time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/14/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER denying 46 Motion for Discovery without prejudice at this time to the Plaintiff filing the specific discovery she intends to seek. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 10/23/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER: Motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 42 is terminated as Moot. The motion to file a reply memorandum 49 is also terminated as Moot. The Magistrate Judge will wait to rule on the first motion for discovery 46 until a response has been received. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 10/16/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed 51 is Granted. Aetna Life Insurance Co. terminated. The remaining claims are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further customized case management. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/12/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 37 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/30/12. (af)
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER: Defendants' Motions for Partial Dismissal 26 and 28 are GRANTED as unopposed, and Plaintiff's breach of fiduciary claim is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/2/12. (dt)
June 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: The Plaintiff filed a motion for an order compelling Defendants to complete the administrative record or to allow her to file a video taped statement dated 11/19/2010. The Defendants will respond to this motion within seven days of its filing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/4/12. (dt)
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: The Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by 4/13/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 6/22/2012. The Defendants shall file the administrative record on or before 3/13/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 3/2/12. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sisk v. Gannet Company, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eileen Sisk
Represented By: Michael Patrick Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gannet Company, Inc.
Represented By: Charles K. Grant
Represented By: Benjamin H. Bodzy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gannet Company, Inc. Income Protection Plan
Represented By: Benjamin H. Bodzy
Represented By: Charles K. Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Represented By: Waverly David Crenshaw, Jr.
Represented By: John E. B. Gerth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?