Roberts et al v. State of Tennessee et al
| Marshall H. Murdock and Charles H. Roberts |
| Henry Steward, William Calhoun, Ruben Hodge, Brenda Jones, Melvin Tirey, State of Tennessee, Derrick R. Schofield, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2011mc00051 |
| August 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to send each of the plaintiffs a blank application to proceed without prepayment of fees, a copy of Administrative Order No. 93, and a blank § 1983 form complaint with instruction sheet. The plaintiffs, in turn, are DIRECTED to resubmit their complaint using the enclosed § 1983 form complaint or following a substantially similar format within 30 days of the date this order is entered on the docket. In addition, along with the complaint, the plaintiffs shall either submit the $350.00 filing fee ($175.00 each); or if either or both plaintiffs lack the funds to pay their share of the filing fee, they must complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with Administrative Ord er No. 93 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2), and return the properly completed application to the district court. The plaintiffs SHALL NOT serve these documents on any of the defendants until the court orders otherwise. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/23/11. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
