March v. Sexton

March v. Sexton

Petitioner:	Perry A. March
Respondent:	David Sexton
Case Number:	3:2012cv00272
Filed:	March 15, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 19, 2013	Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/18/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
June 18, 2013	Filing 84 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Before the Court is petitioner Perry March's Amended Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 53), which replaces and supersedes his original Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 51). The respondent (referred to herein as the "State&q uot;) has filed a response in opposition to the amended motion, and the petitioner has filed a reply brief. The motion is ripe for consideration. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be denied. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/18/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 19, 2013

Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/18/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

June 18, 2013

Filing 84 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Before the Court is petitioner Perry March's Amended Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 53), which replaces and supersedes his original Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 51). The respondent (referred to herein as the "State&q uot;) has filed a response in opposition to the amended motion, and the petitioner has filed a reply brief. The motion is ripe for consideration. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be denied. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/18/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: March v. Sexton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Perry A. March
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: David Sexton
Represented By:	Deshea Dulany Faughn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?