Jefferson v. Barless et al
| Samuel Jefferson |
| Charles Barless, Corizon Mental Health, F,P,W, Law Firm and Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough Law Firm |
| 3:2012cv00485 |
| May 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
210
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 200 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendant's First Amended Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 182 ) is hereby GRANTED; and (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate docu ment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 11/12/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 193 ), recommending that the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 122 & 144 ) filed by Defendants George Barlis and Corizon Inc. (which is improperly named in the C omplaint as Corizon Mental Health) be granted because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to those Defendants. Despite being specifically informed that any objection to the Report and Recommendation needed to be filed within fourteen days of receipt, Plaintiff has filed no objections. Having undertaken the de novo review required by Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recom mendation is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Barlis (Docket No. 122 ) and Corizon (Docket No. 144 ) are hereby GRANTED, and the claims against those Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/31/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER: Motion to Strike 164 is DENIED as Moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/14/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
